Precipitation #1 ------------- -- The Reanalysis precipitation fields are accumulations of short-range (6-hour) forecasts from the NCEP T-62 Reanalysis model. Separate forecasts of total rainfall (PRATE) and convective-only rainfall (CPRAT) are provided, thus "large-scale" (stratiform) rainfall can be obtained by subtracting the convective-only portion from the total (PRATE-CPRAT). The units are kg/m**2/s, and "mm/day" units can be obtained by multiplying the values by 86400. Monthly means of these precipitation forecasts generally compare well with rain gauge analyses over the Northern Hemisphere land areas. In the tropics, comparisons between model rainfall forecasts and satellite rainfall estimates indicated that the former depict the monthly mean features reasonably well, but that the intra-monthly and intra-seasonal variability is poorly represented in the model forecasts. Actual rainfall amounts forecast by the model are generally thought less useful than differences between the forecasts. .................................................... . John E. Janowiak . . Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS/NOAA . . Phone: (301) 763-8227 . . FAX : (301) 763-8395 . . Internet Address: wd52jj@sun1.wwb.noaa.gov . .................................................... Precipitation #2 ------------- -- The precipitation is heavily based on the physical parameterizations in the model and does not use rainfall observations, radar or satellite estimates of rainfall. The precipitation is based on the 0 to 6 hour forecasts started from the analysis. You must remember that the clouds and precipitation are not analyzed but are predicted from the winds, temperature and humidity using the model parameterizations. We've noticed systematic errors between the model's predicted precipitation and observations. Especially notable is the excess rainfall in the South-East United States during the warm season. Tests, however, suggest that the precipitation anomaly (annual cycle removed) is more reasonable. Stationary features related to the Gibb's effect on the model elevation have also been found. Precipitation #3 ------------- -- As always, the Reanalysis precipitation is based on the model physics and is not based not rain gauge, radar or satellite estimates of precipitation. In general, model parameterizations of clouds and precipitation are often considered to be two of the weakest areas in atmospheric modeling. (This situation may change with high-resolution models which can use "micro-physics".) For people who need the actual precipitation, rain gauge data is the most accurate, followed by radar and then satellite estimates of precipitation. The Party line is that the anomalies in the Reanalysis precipitation are more similar to the observed anomalies than the Reanalysis precipitation is to the total rainfall. See SPURIOUS.H2O See SPURRAIN.PS (postscript file) See XPRATE